Three of the Australian banking majors reported their H1FY22 financial results during the month of May (CBA having already reported in February). A broad summary of these results can be seen in the table below.[1]
H1FY22 results (% changes are relative to H1FY21, (Mar’21 to Mar’22)[2] | ||||||
Bank | Net Interest Margins (%) | Cash earnings ($b) | Operating expense ($b) | Return on equity, cash (%) | CET 1 capital ratio[3] (%) | Dividend ($) |
ANZ | 1.58 (-0.05) | 3.11 (+4.1%) | 4.79 (+6.9%) | 10.0 (+0.3) | 11.5 (-0.90) | 0.72 (+0.02) |
CBA | 1.92 (-0.14) | 4.75 (+22.7%) | 5.59 (-0.1%) | 12.3 (+1.8) | 11.3 (-0.80) | 1.75 (+0.25) |
NAB | 1.63 (-0.11) | 3.48 (+4.1%) | 3.96 (+2.6%) | 11.3 (+0.2) | 12.5 (+0.11) | 0.73 (+0.13) |
WBC | 1.85 (-0.24) | 3.10 (-12.4%) | 5.14 (-1.9%) | 8.7 (-1.5) | 11.3 (-1.01) | 0.61 (+0.03) |
H1FY22 results (% changes are relative to H2FY21, (Sep’21 to Mar’22) | ||||||
Bank | Net Interest Margins (%) | Cash earnings ($b) | Operating expense ($b) | Return on equity, cash (%) | CET 1 capital ratio (%) | Dividend ($) |
ANZ | 1.58 (-0.07) | 3.11 (-3.0%) | 4.79 (+4.9%) | 10.0 (-0.2) | 11.5 (-0.80) | 0.72 (0.00) |
CBA | 1.92 (-0.17) | 4.75 (-0.8%) | 5.59 (-3.1%) | 12.3 (-0.3) | 11.3 (-1.30) | 1.75 (-0.25) |
NAB | 1.63 (-0.06) | 3.48 (+8.2%) | 3.96 (+0.2%) | 11.3 (+1.0) | 12.5 (-0.52) | 0.73 (+0.06) |
WBC | 1.85 (-0.14) | 3.10 (+71%) | 5.14 (-9.9%) | 8.7 (+3.7) | 11.3 (-0.99) | 0.61 (+0.01) |
Net Interest Margins
Net Interest Margins (NIMs) declined over the half (and indeed the year) for all majors as a result of fierce competition for loans and a continued customer switch into lower margin fixed rate loans. Notwithstanding the continued contraction in NIMs, banks should benefit from margin expansion over the next year as interest rates rise. CBA’s NIMs continue to be sector-leading.
Cash earnings
Cash earnings benefited from writebacks of large loan loss provisions recorded in the prior period (H2FY21). Westpac’s earnings, in contrast with peers, benefitted from a ramp-up in its cost-out programme (pre-provision profit growth was around 3%), with the bank being the only one of the majors to record an impairment charge (approximately 14 basis points) and also posting the worst revenue decline in the sector. Cash earnings should normalise over coming periods as banks cycle off low earnings.
Operating expenses
As noted, WBC has significantly cut-back on operating expenses and reiterated its ambitious targets to make further reductions in coming years. ANZ’s operating costs were significantly higher during the half, driven by a spike in investment spending. This has led to ANZ abandoning its previously announced expense targets. Similarly, NAB has abandoned its ambitious cost targets as it grapples with cost pressures, namely a result of inflation and increased regulatory costs.
Return on equity
CBA’s Return on Equity (RoE) continues to lead that of peers.
Capital ratios
All banks have adequate CET1 capital ratios, above the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)[4] benchmark.
Dividends:
All banks increased their dividends when compared to H1FY21, as banks continue to cycle off low earnings.
Conclusion:
In general, the banks reported solid results for the first half of FY22. NAB’s result was particularly strong, as earnings were not predominantly a product of cost-cutting, as was the case with Westpac’s. CBA posted a strong result in February, once again justifying the reason why it commands a share price premium relative to the other three. The question remains, given CBA’s Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio of 18, compared to Westpac’s of 16 and the two other majors (approximately 12), as to whether its share price premium is justified. Although it can be argued that CBA has the strongest brand, better economies of scale, more advanced IT systems and investments in high growth companies like Klarna, we would argue that the premium is still excessive. Nevertheless, the immediate outlook for bank earnings remains buoyed by higher net interest margins, although these tailwinds could well be challenged should interest rates move much higher where the prospect of rising loan defaults by overstretched borrowers are likely.