ATO rules foreign incorporated companies may be Australian resident and provides limited opportunity to correct

By Denise Honey - April 17, 2019

The ATO has issued a final ruling (TR 2018/5) and a Practical Compliance Guideline (PCG 2018/9) about the ‘central management and control’ test for determining the tax residence of a company.

The ATO states that where a foreign incorporated company has central management and control in Australia this will be sufficient, in and of itself, for that company to be considered to be Australian tax resident. This is a change from the position previously taken by the ATO in TR 2004/15 (now withdrawn) whereby a company that had its central management and control in Australia was considered a resident only if it also carried on business in Australia. The ATO is giving taxpayers affected by this change until 30 June 2019 to tidy up their governance arrangements before it will employ resources on auditing the residency of these types of entities.

What are the rules about?

On Thursday 21 June 2018, the Commissioner issued a final ruling: TR 2018/5 and a draft Practical Compliance Guideline: PCG 2018/D3 about the ‘central management and control (CMAC)’ test. TR 2018/5 takes the view that when a company has its CMAC in Australia it will also satisfy the ‘carrying on a business in Australia’ requirement. This is a change from the position previously held by the ATO in TR 2004/15 (now withdrawn) whereby this position was only taken in relation to companies without active businesses.

Although CMAC generally rests with a board of directors, the new ruling reiterates the ATO’s view that it is relevant to look at the people actually making the decisions even if they are not the directors. Therefore, a foreign incorporated company may be an Australian tax resident when decisions made by individuals in Australia are merely implemented or rubberstamped by directors in the foreign jurisdiction.

What practical guidance has been provided by the ATO?

The draft PCG was finalised as PCG 2018/9 on 5 December 2018. The PCG contains practical guidance and examples to assist foreign incorporated companies and their advisors in applying the principles set out in TR 2018/5. The PCG focuses on the following: (a) where a company’s central management and control is located, (b) identifying high-level decision making, (c) situations where decisions are made in more than one place (i.e. board meetings are held remotely) and (d) an ongoing compliance approach.

The ATO states in the PCG that as a general rule of thumb, board minutes are the starting point for identifying who exercises CMAC. However, the ATO also makes it clear that this is a general rule only and that there are circumstances in which the place of board meetings will not be determinative. Examples include situations where a company has not kept board minutes, the company makes high-level decisions outside of board meetings, or the board minutes are false (including where they record the ‘rubberstamping’ of decisions made elsewhere).

Transitional compliance approach

Importantly, the finalised PCG provides for a transitional period in which the Commissioner will not apply resources to consider the residency status of certain affected companies, i.e. those who become resident because of the Commissioner’s change in view on the management and control test.

This gives taxpayers a window of opportunity to review and update the way in which companies are managed and controlled so that such companies are not treated as Australian residents by the Commissioner.

Ongoing compliance approach

In the PCG, the Commissioner also provides a series of conditions which, if met by the foreign incorporated company, will mean that the ATO will not employ resources to review the residency status of the company on an ongoing basis. However, we note that this concessionary treatment is only available to public companies or their subsidiaries, specifically: (a) a controlled foreign company of an Australian public group, (b) a listed holding company of a foreign public group, or (c) a wholly owned subsidiary of a foreign public group that is resident in a listed country (there are seven listed countries – Canada, France, Germany, Japan, New Zealand, the UK and the US).

Who do the changes apply to?

The changes apply to foreign incorporated companies with Australian resident directors or Australian resident strategic decision makers. Foreign incorporated companies with non-resident directors/strategic decision makers who habitually exercise management and control in Australia could also be affected.

When do the changes apply from?

The transitional compliance period will end on 30 June 2019.

What are the changes trying to achieve?

Under the new approach the Commissioner will be taxing all companies with their management and control in Australia as Australian resident companies.  In looking at where management and control is located, the Commissioner is using a substance over form approach – i.e. overseas directors that are merely implementing, or ‘rubberstamping’ decisions made by individuals in Australia won’t be considered to be undertaking management and control outside Australia.

How can you mitigate the risk of your client’s foreign incorporated company being considered an Australian resident?

The ATO has given certain affected taxpayers until 30 June 2019 to review their position and bring their governance arrangements into line with the amended ATO view.

Accordingly, it is critical that: (a) taxpayers are aware that foreign incorporated companies in their corporate group can be Australian tax resident, and (b) affected taxpayers have adequate governance arrangements in place to ensure that central management and control of the company is not located in Australia.

Where companies are not eligible for the transitional or ongoing relief provided by the Commissioner in PCG 2018/9, extreme care should be taken in changing their governance or business operations as this could cause unintended consequences.

Resident companies are taxed very differently from non-resident companies and as such any misunderstanding in respect of residency status will likely have fundamental and potentially negative Australian tax consequences.

What is an example of how the changes will operate?

Trade Co is incorporated in Singapore, but its board of directors holds the majority of its meetings in Australia where decisions on the major contracts entered into by Trade Co, its finance, major policies and strategic directions are made. Trade Co undertakes all its trading activities in Singapore.

Under the old rules Trade Co would not be a resident of Australia as it was not considered to be carrying on a business in Australia (based on the view in TR 2004/15).

Under the new rules, Trade Co would be considered a tax resident of Australia as its CMAC is in Australia.

What are the next steps?

Ask your clients if they have any foreign incorporated companies in their groups, as they may not offer this information unprompted.

If you have a client who has foreign incorporated companies in their group, or is proposing to set up a foreign incorporated company, and you are unsure of the application of TR 2018/5 or PCG 2018/9 now is the time to look into it.  Pitcher Partners are happy to help.  Give us a call to discuss.


Contact our experts


Other articles


 

Top of Page







IN THIS SECTION:


Rob Southwell

Rob Southwell's picture

Sydney

Managing Partner and Partner – Private Business and Family Advisory


> View profile

Brendan Britten

Brendan Britten's picture

Melbourne

Managing Partner and Executive Director/Partner- Business Advisory and Assurance


> View profile

Nigel Fischer

Nigel Fischer's picture

Brisbane

Managing Partner - Private Business and Family Advisory


> View profile

Michael Minter

Michael Minter's picture

Newcastle

Managing Partner


> View profile

Leon Mok

Leon Mok's picture

Perth

Managing Director


> View profile

Tom Verco

Tom Verco's picture

Adelaide

Managing Principal - Private Business and Family Advisory


> View profile



Partnership fraud

SUCCESS

Paperwork and independent advice saves partnerships from fraud

Discover more

Kia Ora Horse Stud

CASE STUDY

Pitcher Partners fills a Financial Manager gap to keep the business on track

Discover more

Fuel Injection Company Administration

LEADERSHIP

A fuel injection company began life as an Australian public company before being acquired by a UK publicly listed company while in the research and development stage of a “green...

Discover more



@PitcherPartner EGGCELLENT EASTER | We're having a cracking week with all of our Easter celebrations taking place across our firms.… https://t.co/9PXbd8evrc